![]() ![]() This passage helps to demonstrate that the belief that Jesus was raised from the dead originated extremely early in the history of Christianity. ![]() Many scholars believe that Paul here is quoting from a much earlier Christian creed, which perhaps originated only a few years after Jesus’ death. These witnesses to the resurrected Jesus include the Apostle Peter, James the brother of Jesus, and, most intriguingly, a group of more than 500 people at the same time. In 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, Paul gives a list of people to whom the risen Jesus appeared. Paul is thought to have written this letter around the year 52, about 20 years after Jesus’ death. One key argument in the movie comes from the New Testament writing known as First Corinthians, written by the Apostle Paul to a group of Christians in Corinth to address controversies that had arisen in their community. What do the New Testament writings prove? That in no way proves the historicity of the resurrection. Yet even if these second-century copies are accurate, all we then have are first-century writings that claim Jesus was raised from the dead. I would certainly agree that these early manuscripts provide us with a fairly good idea of what the original form of the New Testament writings might have looked like. Fewer than 10 papyrus manuscripts from the second century exist, and many of these are very fragmentary. While this number of manuscripts sounds very impressive, most of these are relatively late, in many cases from the 10th century or later. He does this in order to argue that we can be quite sure that the original forms of the New Testament writings have been transmitted accurately. Several of its arguments, however, are not directly relevant to this issue.įor instance, Strobel makes much of the fact that there are over 5,000 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament in existence, far more than any other ancient writings. The movie claims that its central focus is on the evidence for the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection. As one character says to Strobel early in the movie, “If the resurrection of Jesus didn’t happen, it’s a house of cards.”Īs a religious studies professor specializing in the New Testament and early Christianity, I hold that Strobel’s book and the movie adaptation have not proven the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection for several reasons. The movie attempts to make a compelling case for historicity of Jesus’ resurrection. ![]() This Friday, April 7, a motion picture adaptation of “The Case for Christ” is being released. His book became one of the bestselling works of Christian apologetic (that is, a defense of the reasonableness and accuracy of Christianity) of all time. Strobel, however, was unable to refute these claims to his satisfaction, and he then converted to Christianity as well. Paramount among these was the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection, but other claims included the belief in Jesus as the literal Son of God and the accuracy of the New Testament writings. In 1998, Lee Strobel, a reporter for the Chicago Tribune and a graduate of Yale Law School, published “The Case for Christ: A Journalist’s Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus.” Strobel had formerly been an atheist and was compelled by his wife’s conversion to evangelical Christianity to refute the key Christian claims about Jesus. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |